Web BankAudit.Net
Search powered by Google
external audits
Stock Option Plan Considerations

 

Sections in this article:

Are Your Options Compensatory or Non-Compensatory?

There are many things to consider when thinking of using stock options. First, and foremost is the debate as to whether the options being offered are either compensatory or non-compensatory. The reason for distinguishing between the two plans is the enormous difference in how you account for the two types of plans.

There are certain stock options and stock purchase plans that may not be intended primarily to compensate employees. For example, a corporation may wish to raise capital or diversify ownership of its stock among its employees or officers. If the difference is no larger per share than that in an offer to all shareholders for the purpose of raising the same amount of money, there is no compensation involved. Characteristics essential in Non-compensatory Stock Options:

  • Substantially all full-time employees meeting limited employee qualifications may participate (employees owning a specified percent of the outstanding stock and executives may be excluded)
  • Stock is offered to eligible employees equally or based on a uniform percentage of salary or wages (the plan may limit the number of shares of stock that an employee may purchase through the plan)
  • The time permitted to exercise the rights is limited to a reasonable period.
  • Any discount from the market price is no greater than would be a reasonable offer of stock to shareholders or others.

Stock option plans that meet the requirements of a non-compensatory plan do not require the recognition of compensation expense by the sponsoring company. Plans that do not contain these characteristics are usually classified as compensatory plans and compensation expense must be recorded. To learn how to account for non-compensatory and compensatory stock options see following section entitled “Accounting Treatments for Stock-Based Compensation.”

< Back to top >

Understanding Your Option Plan

Book

Compensatory Options
Non-Compensatory Options

The Criteria To Be Met

 
Compensatory Options
  • Does not meet all four requirements of a Non-Compensatory option.
 
Non-Compensatory
  • Substantially all full-time employees meeting limited employee qualifications may participate.
  • Stock is offered to eligible employees equally or based on a uniform percentage of salary or wages.
  • The time permitted to exercise the rights is limited to a reasonable period.
  • Any discount from the market price is no greater than would be a reasonable offer of stock to shareholders or others.
 
 
 
 
 
Once you have determined which type of option you have you must then address the accounting and tax implications.
 
 
 
 

How To Account for Stock Options - Book

 

Compensatory

Two Methods:

  • Intrinsic Value Method- (APB 25) compensation cost, (if any is recognized ratably over the service period in the income statement), is the excess of the fair value of the stock at the measurement date (usually grant date) over the amount the employee must pay.
    Whether the options have intrinsic value (whereby cost is recognized in the income statement) or not Pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share based on the fair value method (SFAS 123) must be included.
  • Fair Value Method- (SFAS 123) preferable and encouraged, but NOT required. Compensation cost is based on the fair value of the equity instrument awarded, determined by an option pricing model (Black-Scholes), net of any amount the employees must pay for the instrument when it is exercised. Total cost is allocated and recognized ratably over the service period in the income statement.
  • Under either method when booking a deferred compensation expense you must recognized and book a Deferred Tax Asset.

For a further explanation and a detailed example on accounting for stock options see the section called “Accounting Treatments for Stock-Based Compensation”

 

Non-Compensatory

  • Recorded at the time they are exercised (APB 25)
  • No Income Statement effect at grant date
  • Disclosure should be made as to the status of the option or plan at the end of the period of report, including the number of shares under option, and option price, and the number of shares as to which options were exercisable.

No Journal Entry at Grant Date

 
Debit
Credit
Journal Entry (date exercised)
Cash (option price)
XXX
     Common Stock
XXX
     Paid In Capital
XXX

 
         
 
The information above is meant to be used in gaining a general understanding of how to classify and account for stock options, it is not inclusive or exhausting in material please refer to APB 25, SFAS 123, FASB 148, for more information. Warning FASB has issued an Exposure Document to amend statement No. 123, which would eliminate the use of APB 25 in accounting for stock compensation plans.
 

Understaning Your Option Plan

Tax

Compensatory Options
Non-Compensatory Options

The Criteria To Be Met

 
 
 
 

Non-Qualified Stock Option

  • Does not meet the qualification of an incentive stock option (qualified).
  • Nonqualified stock options can be granted to employees and non-employees (directors and outside consultants)
 

Qualified Stock Options / ISO

  • Options must be granted under a plan established by the company.
  • Granted only to Employees and exercisable only by the employee.
  • Can be issued to a selective and discriminatory basis.
  • Options must be granted within 10 years from the date the plan is adopted and approved.
  • Options must be exercisable within 10 years from the date of the grant.
  • Employee, at the time the option is granted, may not own more than 10% of the total combined voting power of the employer’s stock.
 
 
 
 
How to Account For Stock Options - Tax(Employer)
 
 
 
 

Non Qualified Stock Options

  • An employer may deduct the value of a nonqualifed stock option as a business expense for the tax year in which the option is includible in the gross income of the employee.
  • Employers deduction equals the amount of income recognized by employee.
  • Deductible portion is excess of the fair market value of the stock received less what the employee paid for the stock (reported on W-2) as ordinary compensation.
 

Qualified Stock Options / ISO

  • Generally no tax implications to the employer.
 
 
 
 
How to Account For Stock Options - Tax (Employee)
 
 

Non-Qualified Stock Options

  • Employee will include the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the stock as ordinary compensation that will be included in their W-2
 

Qualified Stock Options / ISO

  • At the date of the grant there is no income tax affect.
  • At the date of exercise (Assumption is without immediate sale) the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying security is a tax preference item for Alternative Minimum Tax. Therefore employee may pay alternative minimum tax.
  • At the later date of sale of the stock obtained from option exercise the difference between the exercise price and the sales price is recorded as a capital gain (subject to holding period requirement). There is also available an AMT credit for the amount of AMT originally paid (if any) when exercised.

 

 

< Back to top >

Accounting Treatments for Stock-Based Compensation

Once you have distinguished and classified whether your plan is non-compensatory or compensatory you must then measure the plan accordingly. Both plans are accounted for in extremely different ways.

Non-Compensatory Stock Options are recorded at the time they are exercised. No journal entries are made when the options are granted. In relation to financial statements, disclosure should be made as to the status of the option or plan at the end of the period of report, including the number of shares under option, the option price, and the number of shares as to which options were exercisable. As to options exercised during the period, disclosure should be made of the number of shares involved and the option price thereof.

Compensatory Stock Options are accounted for in a completely different way than Non-Compensatory Stock Options. Since the issuance of SFAS No. 123, two methods of accounting for stock based compensation exist.

The intrinsic value method is the method previously used (under APBO 25), where compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the stock at the measurement date over the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option. If the intrinsic value method is elected, then pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share based on the fair value method must be included.

The fair value method is the method that is preferable and encouraged, but NOT required. Compensation cost is based on the fair value of the equity instrument awarded, determined by an option pricing model, net of any amount the employees must pay for the instrument when it is exercised.

The fair value method is the preferred method because it will always calculate some amount of compensation expense and allocates it over the compensation (vesting) period. Where as the (older) intrinsic value method typically would not calculate a compensation cost because it values’ the plan at the grant date by excess fair value (market price) over the amount the employee must pay. Typically with most fixed stock option plans the amount the employee must pay is the market price of the stock on the grant date, thus there is no excess fair value and no compensation costs.

The fair value method calculates the compensation expense by using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. Which is a model that attempts to determine the value of an option by measuring the difference between the present value of the underlying (the common stock that can be purchased) on the exercise date and the present value of the option price on the exercise date by using the following factors: standard normal distribution, continuous compounding at the risk-free rate, market value of the underlying on the grant date, option price, expected life of the option, expected dividends on the underlying, volatility of the underling’s price.

An example of the difference between the two methods follows:

An employee takes a position with a company and is offered stock options that are exercisable after he has worked 5 years with the company. Data related to the options:

   
   APBO 25  
 
SFAS No. 123
Fair Value (underlying plus options) at grant date  
$
140
  $
140
Market value at grant date  
100
100
Option Price  
100
100
Market price 5 years later  
200
200
Total Compentsation expense  
*40
**60
   
Journal entries  
   APBO 25  
SFAS No. 123
JE #1 (grant date)  
 
Deferred Compensation  
40
 
60
     APIC-stock options  
40
 
60
   
JE #2-6 (end of year 1,2,3,4,5)  
Compensation expense  
8
12
     Deferred compensation  
8
12
   
JE #7  
Cash  
100
100
APIC - stock options  
40
60
     Common stock (at par)  
90
90
     Paid-incapital in excess of par  
50
70
   
*
FMV of stock plus option grant date(140) - FMV of stock at grant date (100)
**
Estimated FMV of stock at exerecise date(200) - FMV of stock plus option at grant date (140)

< Back to top >

 

Contact Nichols, Cauley & Associates by Email, phone, or online form with your questions.

Site visitors should keep in mind that the content is generally designed to be of general applicability. Particular state laws, regulations and special contractual provisions can greatly impact rights, responsibilities and legal obligations. Only a competent attorney, accountant or other professional looking at all the pertinent facts and circumstances of a particular situation can provide definitive guidance for you. Please refer to our important legal discalimer which can be accessed from the bottom of any BankAudit.net webpage.

This site copyrighted,designed and maintained by Nichols, Cauley and Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.
Any comments or problems relating to the site should be sent by e-mail to Webmaster@BankAudit.net.
D/b/a Nichols, Cauley & Associates, PLLC in North Carolina